n8n 
Make (Integromat) n8n vs Make (Integromat) 2026: Automation Features, Pricing, and Comparison
A detailed comparison of n8n vs Make (Integromat) covering features, pricing (Community Edition (self-hosted): free forever, unlimited workflows/executions vs Free: 1,000 ops/mo, 2 active scenarios, 15-min interval), integrations, pros and cons, and which automation tool is best for your team in 2026.
Table of Contents
n8n vs Make (Integromat): Which Automation Tool Is Right for You?
n8n and Make (Integromat) are two of the most recognized names in the automation space. Both have strong user bases, regular updates, and comprehensive feature sets. However, they approach the category differently.
n8n focuses on Visual node-based workflow editor, 1,500+ integrations (400+ core nodes), Code Node (JavaScript/Python with npm). Make (Integromat) emphasizes Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas), 3,000+ Pre-Built App Integrations, Routers and Conditional Logic (branching). Understanding these core differences is key to making the right choice for your team.
Quick Overview
| Dimension | n8n | Make (Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Free Plan | Community Edition (self-hosted): free forever, unlimited workflows/executions | Free: 1,000 ops/mo, 2 active scenarios, 15-min interval |
| Starting Price | Cloud Starter €20/mo: 2,500 executions/mo, 5 concurrent, 1 shared project | Core $9.99/mo: 10,000 ops/mo, unlimited scenarios, 1-min interval |
| Key Features | Visual node-based workflow editor, 1,500+ integrations (400+ core nodes), Code Node (JavaScript/Python with npm) | Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas), 3,000+ Pre-Built App Integrations, Routers and Conditional Logic (branching) |
| Best For | Teams needing Visual node-based workflow editor | Teams needing Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas) |
Feature Comparison: n8n vs Make (Integromat)
Here is how the two platforms compare across key dimensions:
- Pricing: n8n starts with "Community Edition (self-hosted): free forever, unlimited workflows/executions" while Make (Integromat) starts with "Free: 1,000 ops/mo, 2 active scenarios, 15-min interval". Both offer competitive pricing.
- Core Features: n8n offers Visual node-based workflow editor, 1,500+ integrations (400+ core nodes), Code Node (JavaScript/Python with npm), AI Agent Nodes and LangChain Integration. Make (Integromat) offers Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas), 3,000+ Pre-Built App Integrations, Routers and Conditional Logic (branching), Iterators and Aggregators.
- Integrations: n8n connects with 25 tools including google-sheets, google-drive, slack. Make (Integromat) integrates with 15 tools including google-workspace, slack, hubspot.
- Ease of Use: Both platforms have polished interfaces, but the optimal choice depends on your team's technical comfort level and specific workflow requirements.
Final Verdict: n8n vs Make (Integromat)
**Choose n8n if**: Your team prioritizes Visual node-based workflow editor and 1,500+ integrations (400+ core nodes), you need the specific workflow approach n8n offers, and you value their ecosystem and integrations.
**Choose Make (Integromat) if**: Your team needs Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas) and 3,000+ Pre-Built App Integrations, you prefer Make (Integromat)'s approach to automation, or their pricing model better fits your budget.
Both platforms offer free trials — the best way to decide is to test each with your actual workflow and see which your team prefers.
FAQs
Which is better, n8n or Make (Integromat)?
Both are excellent automation platforms but serve different needs. n8n excels at Visual node-based workflow editor and 1,500+ integrations (400+ core nodes), while Make (Integromat) is stronger with Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas) and 3,000+ Pre-Built App Integrations. The best choice depends on your specific workflow, team size, and budget.
Is n8n cheaper than Make (Integromat)?
n8n offers "Community Edition (self-hosted): free forever, unlimited workflows/executions" while Make (Integromat) offers "Free: 1,000 ops/mo, 2 active scenarios, 15-min interval". For paid plans, compare their pricing pages directly as costs vary by team size and feature requirements.
Can n8n replace Make (Integromat)?
It depends on your specific use case. n8n is designed for Visual node-based workflow editor and 1,500+ integrations (400+ core nodes) while Make (Integromat) focuses on Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas) and 3,000+ Pre-Built App Integrations. For basic needs, either may work. For specialized workflows, one may be clearly better.
Related Tools
Make (Integromat)
Visual automation platform to connect apps and build complex workflows visually.
Explore More Tools
Browse our complete directory of 99 SaaS tools and compare features, pricing, and alternatives.