Make (Integromat) vs n8n: Which Automation Tool is Better? (2026 Comparison)
Detailed Make (Integromat) vs n8n comparison: 15 vs 15 features, Freemium vs Free pricing, pros & cons, integrations, and a verdict to help you choose the right automation tool.
Table of Contents
Make (Integromat) vs n8n: Which One Wins?
If you have narrowed your automation search down to Make (Integromat) and n8n, you are in a good spot — both are strong contenders. But they serve different needs. Make (Integromat) leans into visual scenario builder (drag-and-drop canvas) while n8n shines at visual node-based workflow editor. This comparison breaks down features, pricing, integrations, and real-world use cases to help you pick the right one for your team.
Quick Overview
Here is how Make (Integromat) and n8n compare at a glance:
| Dimension | Make (Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Pricing | Freemium (free tier available) | Free (completely free) |
| Core Features | 15 | 15 |
| Integrations | 15 | 25 |
| Best For | Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas) | Visual node-based workflow editor |
Feature Comparison: Make (Integromat) vs n8n
When you put them side by side, here is how the feature sets compare:
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas) | ✓ | — |
| 3,000+ Pre-Built App Integrations | ✓ | — |
| Routers and Conditional Logic (branching) | ✓ | — |
| Iterators and Aggregators | ✓ | — |
| Webhook Listener and HTTP Modules | ✓ | — |
| AI Agents (Maia — workflows via natural language) | ✓ | — |
| AI Toolkit (pre-built AI modules) | ✓ | — |
| Make Grid (automation landscape overview) | ✓ | — |
| Analytics Dashboard | ✓ | — |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | ✓ | — |
| Custom Variables and Functions | ✓ | — |
| Error Handling and Execution Logs | ✓ | — |
| MCP Server (connect AI to scenarios) | ✓ | — |
| Custom Apps and REST API Access | ✓ | — |
| SSO, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR Compliance | ✓ | — |
| Visual node-based workflow editor | — | ✓ |
| 1,500+ integrations (400+ core nodes) | — | ✓ |
| Code Node (JavaScript/Python with npm) | — | ✓ |
| AI Agent Nodes and LangChain Integration | — | ✓ |
| HTTP Request Node (connect to any API) | — | ✓ |
| Webhook and Cron/Scheduled Triggers | — | ✓ |
| Git-based version control and environments | — | ✓ |
| Queue Mode (horizontal scaling) | — | ✓ |
| External Secrets Management | — | ✓ |
| Workflow History and Execution Search | — | ✓ |
| Debug in Editor with Data Pinning | — | ✓ |
| Self-hosted (Docker, K8s, air-gapped) or Cloud | — | ✓ |
| RBAC, Shared Projects and Admin Roles | — | ✓ |
| AI Assistant for workflow generation | — | ✓ |
| Community nodes and plugin system | — | ✓ |
About Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat) is a automation tool that visual automation platform to connect apps and build complex workflows visually. Its headline features — Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas), 3,000+ Pre-Built App Integrations, Routers and Conditional Logic (branching), Iterators and Aggregators — are backed by 15 ecosystem of 15 integrations. With Freemium pricing, it positions itself as a low-risk entry point with room to scale.
About n8n
n8n takes a slightly different approach to automation. Open-source workflow automation tool with fair-code licensing and self-hosting. Its Visual node-based workflow editor, 1,500+ integrations (400+ core nodes), Code Node (JavaScript/Python with npm), AI Agent Nodes and LangChain Integration features are designed with visual node-based workflow editor at the forefront, and it connects with 25 external tools. Priced at Free, it appeals to budget-conscious users.
Pricing: Make (Integromat) vs n8n
Pricing is often the deciding factor. Make (Integromat) uses a Freemium model, with a free tier for basic use and paid plans for advanced features.
n8n, on the other hand, is Free, completely free.
Make (Integromat) has the edge on cost.
Make (Integromat) Pros & Cons
Here is an honest look at Make (Integromat)'s strengths and weaknesses:
Pros
- Freemium pricing — generous free tier, paid upgrades are optional
- 15 features including Visual Scenario Builder (drag-and-drop canvas), 3,000+ Pre-Built App Integrations, Routers and Conditional Logic (branching)
- Native integrations with 15 tools
- Mature product with active development
Cons
- Paid tiers can get expensive as you scale
- Learning curve beyond the basics — advanced features take time to master
- Best suited for automation use cases; may not replace specialized tools for adjacent workflows
n8n Pros & Cons
And here is the same for n8n:
Pros
- Free pricing — completely free
- 15 features including Visual node-based workflow editor, 1,500+ integrations (400+ core nodes), Code Node (JavaScript/Python with npm)
- Integrates with 25 popular tools
Cons
- Premium features locked behind paid plans
- Steeper learning curve for power features
- automation-specific — not a general-purpose tool
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Here is the short version: both Make (Integromat) and n8n are capable automation tools, but they excel in different areas. Make (Integromat) is the better choice for teams that need visual scenario builder (drag-and-drop canvas) and value cost predictability. n8n is a stronger fit when visual node-based workflow editor is critical and you prefer a try-before-you-buy approach.
Our recommendation: start with the free or freemium option of whichever tool aligns best with your primary use case, then evaluate whether the paid tier (if needed) justifies the investment.
FAQs
Which is better, Make (Integromat) or n8n?
Both Make (Integromat) and n8n are respected tools in the automation space, but they excel in different areas. Make (Integromat) is particularly strong at visual scenario builder (drag-and-drop canvas), while n8n stands out for visual node-based workflow editor. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget. If possible, try both using their free tiers.
Is Make (Integromat) better than n8n?
It depends on what matters to you. Make (Integromat) offers 15 features compared to n8n's 15, and their pricing models differ (Freemium vs Free). The biggest differentiator is cost — Make (Integromat) has the more accessible pricing.
What is the price difference between Make (Integromat) and n8n?
Make (Integromat) uses a Freemium model, while n8n is Free. The key difference: Make (Integromat) offers more flexible entry pricing, while n8n may require a larger upfront commitment.
Related Tools
Make (Integromat)
Visual automation platform to connect apps and build complex workflows visually.
Explore More Tools
Browse our complete directory of 99 SaaS tools and compare features, pricing, and alternatives.